Palestinians caught in a vice grip during COVID-19 pandemic
On March 2020 took place the
third general elections for the 120 sets on the Knesset. The results have seen
the victory of the right-wing Likud party, leaded by Netanyahu, obtaining 58
seats, although his charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in Nov 2019,
and the left-wing “Blue and white” party, headed by Gantz. After several
compromises, the 20th of April an emergency government of national unity was
established for a limited period of time of 36 months, presided by Netanyahu
for the first 18 months and by Gantz during next 18 months, under the approval
of the president Rivlin. During the first phase, Gantz will be vice-premier and
Minister of Defence. The shifting on the guidance of executive will be regulated
by a Knesset’s law. This even slight predominance of Likud party will entail
the implementation of the US President Trump “deal of the century”, which encompasses
the Israel annexation of the occupied West Bank territory, including the Jordan
Valley region and some nature reserves. As a matter of facts, Israeli government
has been authorized to bring such a plan, that would include up to 30% of the
total West Bank area, to debate in the Knesset since 1 July 2020.
AI underlines that this agreement
would worsen the “flagrant” human rights breaches occurring in the cited
territories, the impunity of the war crimes, crimes against humanity and other
gross violations. Being annexation an acquisition of territories by the
use of force, it’s infringing at the same time the art. 2 (4) UN Charter, norm
of jus cogens that expressly
prohibits the threat and the use of
force, both against the territorial integrity or political independence of any
State and in any other manner incompatible with the purposes of the UN. This
plan would extend Israeli law to the OPT, not changing their legal status. In fact,
under domestic Israeli law, it’s nothing else but an Israeli settlement expansion,
thus denying civil and political rights to Palestinians, their freedom of
movement, of speech, of association, equality and non-discrimination rules.
As well known, the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the world long lasting struggle between
two self-determination movements: the Jewish Zionist and the Palestinian
nationalism, claiming the same territories, and during this atavic conflict
Israel has been accused of Apartheid against non-Israeli people, as in South
Africa. On both sides, have been recorded unlawful killings, that are crime of
war, arbitrary detentions, many forms of discrimination, human trafficking, denial
of humanitarian access, abuses and maiming of women and children, used as human
shields and forced to be involved in military actions in an overall framework
of clashes, incitation campaigns and retaliations.
According to many Ngos, In his annual report on children and armed
conflict, the UN Secretary General Guterres reported in June 2020 the omission
from the “list of shame” of States
perpetrating these crimes the Saudi-led coalition, Yemen, Myanmar and also
Israel, despite these kind of abuses have been well-documented by UN and many human
rights associations and organizations all over the world are asking this list will
be evidence-based, avoiding to coddle powerful countries.
The uprising of the turmoils in
these strips of land are likely to escalate to a planetary level. In front of what has been described by A.I. as
an incoming “law of the jungle” following last elections, it’s currently urging
international community to strengthen the implementation of international law remarking
that any annexation of the occupied West Bank is nul and void. It’s also
claiming an halt of the construction of Israeli illegal settlements and
infrastructures in the OPT and all trades with them, decryingamong other
violations against Palestianian rights, the right of return of the refugees, supporting
ICC investigations and calling on governments to provide political and tangible
contributions and proofs to the Court on the ongoing situation.
According to art.47 of the 4th Geneva
Convention, protected people in occupied territories shall not be deprived of
their rights as the result of an occupation, neither by any agreement concluded
between the authorities of the occupied territories and the occupying powers,
nor by any force agglomeration of whole or part of the territories. Moreover,
it’s not clear what will be ruled out about citizenships and residency under
this incorporation of lands. Israeli PM Netanyahu affirmed that Palestinian
residents in the areas wouldn’t get Israeli citizenship also after annexation.
Getting advantage of the illegal
block in Gaza and fragmentation among the OPT population, annexation would
result in a mass-expropriation of lands and home demolition, thus violating also
the adequate housing right (in 2019 Israel demolished 617 Palestinian
structures and evicted 899 people in the West Bank). The law of occupation
prohibits demolitions if not necessary for military operations. Punishing
demolitions are collective punishments, thus forbidden by international law as
well as the transfer of prisoners in the occupying country, being in Israel occurring
administrative detentions, with no fair process, of about 4600 people.
The PA, governing body of
autonomous Palestinians regions, and the paramilitary PLO called international
community to impose sanctions against Israel and started boycotts and disinvestment,
declaring to consider this expansion as a “declaration of war” and that Israeli
will endure their resistance in any forms .
On the wave of the USA proposed
“Deal of the Century”, an “International Conference on the Question of
Palestine” was held last February in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, gathering practitioners,
academics and civil society, in order to thwart the phenomenon of unilateral
actions and to implement the substantive exercise of inalienable rights in
Palestine. In this occasion ASEAN Member States were urged to continue their
operations in the pursuit of the justice and peace and was rebutted the uselessness
of a new plan and the necessity of giving effectiveness to agreements and UN
resolutions already existing, on the basis of the “two-State formula”.
More precisely, the 28 Jan, Trump
administration held a press conference in the White House, announcing the “Peace
to prosperity: a vision to improve the lives of the Palestinian and Israeli
people” plan, that was welcomed by the new Israeli coalition government. It
proposed the incorporation of the existing Israeli settlements in West Bank;
Jerusalem as undivided Israeli capital; a territory for the future Palestine,
including parts of West Bank, Gaza strip and some Jerusalem surrounding;
linking means of transport with Palestinian territories, by building new roads,
bridges and tunnels; freezing for 4 years Israeli settlement constructions; US
embassy in Palestine; investment of $ 50 billion to build a new Palestinian State.
In Europe, France and UK, but
also Arab countries, such as Gulf Arab States, have highlighted and recognized
that, although their Israeli backing, this plan is objectively occurring in straight
violation of international law, thus execrable and severely affecting and
damaging Palestinians human rights, not even ensuring the international minimum
standards and the right of repatriation.
The PA and the League of Arab
States, among others, rejected the plan and under the mounting pressure of
Tunisia and Indonesia, USA proposed many amendments. It’s crystal clear that latest protests against the announced plan and the lockdown
security measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19, have dragged Palestinians
in a hell of oppression and restrictions that considerably limit the freedom of
civilians that are currently exacerbating further clashes and opposing counter-attacks,
trespassing the ban of gathering due to the pandemic and the quarantine
imposition, being their lives at risk in any case.
The outbreak of Coronavirus in
2019 has opened new dialogues and collaboration purposes between Palestinians
and Israelian in the attempt to ease the peaceful process in the Middle Est, being
the watchword a strong cooperation on the ground, both locally and
internationally. Nicholay Mlandenov, the Bulgarian Special Coordinator for the
Middle East Process in the UN Security Council, underlined the “inspiring
example” of cooperation in these lands, before the elections, in the fight for
the marginalization of Covid-19 and seized the moment to impact communities in
order to make further steps toward peace and to reject unilateral decisions. In
this perspective, UN has delivered over $ 1 mln of aid items, such as
protective equipment and test kits, for Palestinians hospitals and clinics, due
to their insufficient funds. Special Coordinator added that UN will do his
utmost for the well-being and safety of Palestinians and Israelis, ensuring
that no less than $137 million would be transferred to the region in the coming
four months. UN acts in this direction especially through the Middle East
Quartet, composed of Russian Federation, USA, EU, UN, that see cooperating the
world’s existent superpower countries and institutions involved in the
pacification of these areas, their agencies (i.e. UNRWA and OCHA) and WHO. The
1 July hundreds of Palestinians gathered in Gaza and West Bank against the
annexation. The following day, Pope Francis summoned the US and Israeli
ambassadors for preventing an escalation of violence, reckoning that the state
of Palestine and that of Israel have the same right “to exist and live in
security, within international recognized borders”, discouraging unilateral
actions.
The Pope and UN are, in fact, in
search of an establishment that seems will never happen, trying to demonize the
upcoming of a new world conflict, triggering an international alarm to stop
this crusade and massacre of civilians. The Holy See recognized the State of
Palestine in 2013, soon after followed the recognition by the UN with the
status of non-Member State Observer... Last March also the Muslim World League urged the moral duty
of an interfaith partnership to overcome the crisis.
In order to limit the spread of
the virus, Israeli government has approved a legislation for a partial lockdown
and has increased restrictions of movement for people and trade, exception done
for health and humanitarian workers in Gaza strip. It has imposed a curfew in
the West Bank and also tactically allowed counter-terrorism surveillance to
track infections. On the other hand, in Palestine an internal cooperation has
been tightened between Hamas and Fatah.
Israel was one of the first countries
to close its borders and imposed restrictions when the global pandemic first outburst
by adopting measures such as the suspension of public prayers. The PA followed
its example but the mosques are still opened.
The Israeli Minister of Defense and
the alternate PM Gantz has announced that it would be desirable that the
propagandized annexation would take place after the proclaimed state of
emergency due to the coronavirus. In fact, the Palestinian Ministry of Health,
last week, said that 2636 people have tested positive for Covid-19 compared
with 1256 recorded a week ago, expressing the fear of a “second wave” of
infections, after the lockdown lifting measures of last May.
What furthermore is inflaming the
crisis is the Palestinian economic dependence on Israel, especially for the
150.000 Palestinians working in Israel (5000 in Gaza) with official permit and
about 60.000 work illegally in Gaza strip and West Bank. Their average daily
income is 250 Israeli shekels (about $70 per day), so the adopted restrictions
mean depriving hundreds of millions of dollars addressed to the Palestinian
market and a decline of their purchasing power, due to the lack of liquidity, halving
Palestinians civil servants wages. Moreover, the health measures imposed at
Israeli airports, crossings and ports have impeded the arrival of imported
products from Palestine, whose exportations have been banned. To get things
worse OPEC continues to cut oil exports, raising the prices. The WB reported in
April that, if Coronavirus crisis and relating economic aftermath wouldn’t have
a countertrend, Palestinian economy will shrink by 7%, causing an unprecedented
collapse. Palestinian Financial Minister
has already asked Israel a loan of 500 million Israeli shekels ($141 millions)
per month until the end of the pandemic but it’s unlikely it could get it.
So, in conclusion, the economic
downturn, the spread of Covid-19 and the paralysis caused by the stark
contraposition between both nationalisms, claiming the same lands by reason of
their religious auspices, perspectives and aspirations funded on their believes, have shed light to the weakness of the
international efforts in the Middle East, and in particular in Israel and Palestine,
putting them in the hands of Trump’s American hegemonic policy of “America
first” mainly driven, not only by ideological, but also anti-terrorist aims. Although
resounding speeches, has been revealed a consistent lack of democracy and effective
protectionism of liberal values, especially on hand, from USA, and through
continuous terrorist attacks from Palestinian organizations conducting
terroristic activities, such as i.e. Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, al-Aqsa
Martyr Brigade and LFP, on the other, bearing in mind that “terrorism” has been
defined in 1994 by the UN as “criminal
acts intended or calculating to provoke a state of terror in general public, a
group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any
circumstances unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of political,
philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that
may be invoked to justify them”, it’s
clear that on both sides the destiny of innocent civilians, that are daily
struggling simply for their livelihood is again put at risk. Economically screwed
up and politically undermined, many Palestinians are actually living in danger
and violence, are often forced, with no escape, to be enrolled in military
corps, terroristic or legally recognized, in order to avoid indigence, in a
quest for revenge and social redemption.
Once again, in the slowness and inadequacy of the
political summits in the control rooms of power to find out equitable solutions,
clumsy changing strategies in the international arena, long distant from the
alarming and dramatic reality, this is one of the saddest quarrels in which are
one more time helpless and martyred civilians that keep on paying the highest
penalty for superpowers damages, their unready answer and adequate proposals in
a framework in which are the extremist position to do the big part and is left
less and less space for moderate forces to negotiate peaceful and long-lasting
solutions.
Comments
Post a Comment